Category: election automation
Presentation: Parallel Manual Count by Gus Lagman [updated]
Attached are two versions of my presentation: the first was delivered last Friday before top news editors of TV and print media; the second was presented this morning during a press conference at the Club Filipino (which was broadcast “live” on ANC).
One difference that might make you wonder is that in the first, I stated that the manual count for all positions would take 2 days. In the second, it’s 4 days. In the first, I was referring only to the precinct activities; in the second, I included the additional two days at the canvassing levels.
It’s only 14-1/2 days before election day and the closer we get to that day, the more difficult it would be to implement our proposed solution to automated cheating. We desperately need the help of media in putting pressure on the Comelec to adopt this parallel manual count (or “100% manual audit”, or “manual verification of results”, take your pick, they’re all the same).
We might get an audience with the Comelec en banc tomorrow morning. Let’s all pray that they agree to our proposal. If they don’t… may God help us.
Thank you and warmest regards,
Gus Lagman
PS: Sonny Marcelo, former Ombudsman, commented this morning, “Usually, people are happy when they are being proven right. But I can see that Gus is unhappy (and truly worried, if I may add) for being now proven right!”
News: Big business groups call for manual count

Commission on Elections Chairman Jose Melo offers a toast while holding the last ballot printed at the National Printing Office yesterday. The NPO has printed 50,850,939 ballots to be used in next month’s automated elections.
PhilSTAR.com: MANILA, Philippines – The country’s major business groups want the Commission on Elections (Comelec) to conduct a parallel manual count of the votes for president, vice president and mayors to ensure transparency in the country’s first automated polls.
The Makati Business Club (MBC), the Management Association of the Philippines (MAP) and the Financial Executives Institute of the Philippines (FINEX) said a parallel manual count would entail P500 million in expenses – and additional man-hours – but would make the results of the elections more credible.
Information technology expert Gus Lagman has made a similar appeal to the Comelec.
The business groups said six of the nine presidential candidates have endorsed the manual count proposal. Only Nacionalista Party (NP) standard-bearer Sen. Manuel Villar Jr. and Lakas-Kampi-CMD candidate Gilbert Teodoro have not given their positions on the proposal. Bagumbayan standard-bearer Sen. Richard Gordon, meanwhile, is against it because he is one of the proponents of the poll automation law.
The group said manual counting is “more reflective of the will of the voters.”
The business groups arrived at the decision to support a manual count of the votes at a meeting attended by Finex president Gregorio Navarro, MBC executive director Alberto Lim, MAP chairman Ramon del Rosario, MAP members former Trade secretary Juan Santos, and former Development Bank of the Philippines chairman Vitaliano Nanagas, among others.
Lagman said they would present their proposal to the Comelec on Monday. He said the Comelec must decide on their proposal before April 29 as there is little time left before the May 10 elections.
He said a manual counting of votes can stave off a failure of elections as well as ensure that an “automated Garci” does not succeed.
“Garci” is widely believed to refer to former elections commissioner Virgilio Garcillano who reportedly helped manipulate the results of the 2004 elections to ensure Mrs. Arroyo’s victory against the late popular actor Fernando Poe Jr. A wiretapped phone conversation between Mrs. Arroyo and a man she called “Garci” regarding an alleged poll fraud plot became the basis of unsuccessful impeachment cases against her.
Lagman, meanwhile, said there is a need for a backup manual count and not just a random count, citing possible glitches in the technology of Smartmatic-TIM, the consortium undertaking the automated election system.
The proposal of the businessmen is to make a manual count of the votes for the three positions and compare them with the automated results. If the discrepancy is less than one percent then the machine count will be used, but if the discrepancy is one percent or more then there is a need to manually count all the votes for all the positions.
The manual count for the president, vice president and mayor will only take an additional three hours, but if there is a discrepancy then the manual count may mean an additional two days. “But what is that compared to credible and honest elections,” Del Rosario said.
The business groups said they have already addressed the concerns of the Comelec regarding their proposal.
They added that there is nothing in the law that prohibits manual counting of the votes for the three positions.
The manual count of the votes for the three positions, they said, would eliminate the need for random manual audit.
The random manual audit will be done after the proclamation of winners. The random audit covers five precincts per district, or equivalent to roughly one million voters.
Earlier, the Philippine Bar Association and the Alyansa Agrikultura also pushed for parallel manual counting of votes to countercheck results of the precinct count optical scan (PCOS) machines.
A group of overseas Filipinos with signatories from the United States and other countries was also set to petition the Comelec for a parallel manual account.
Press Release: Comelec’s last chance, say farmers

“Next week may be the last chance for Comelec to take two decisive actions that will leave a legacy to be admired and respected, rather than criticized and disparaged.” This was the press statement read by Alyansa Agrikultura Chair Ernesto Ordonez.
The Alyansa Agrikultura is a farmer-fisherfolk coalition composed of 42 federations and organizations representing all the major agricultural sub-sectors. This is the largest voting sector, composed of 40% of the electorate or 16 million voters. Because of this, the Alyansa had been previously invited to three Joint Congressional Oversight Committee (JCOC) hearings on Automated Election.
The Alyansa statement said that the first key action is to adopt the 100% precinct parallel manual count for the president, vice president and mayor or governor, as had been suggested by the IT professionals last April 13. If the manual count is similar to the computer count, then the automation can proceed with an average delay of only three hours.
However, if the manual count differs significantly from the computer count, there is a great probability that the computer was rigged. In these cases, there will be an additional four days to manually count all the votes and transmit them. Nevertheless, the ensuing seven-day time frame to complete the process is only 1/6 of the 42-day period under the old system. Jaime Tadeo, Rice Council of the Philippines chair, said, “This slight delay is well worth the benefit of enhanced confidence in the elections that will take place.”
The second key action is to implement what the Alyansa Agrikultura had previously proposed during the January 27 Joint Congressional Oversight Committee hearing on automated elections: to make transparent the canvassing of the votes with a check and balance system. This means that the canvassing center must show not only the total vote count in the center (Certificate of Canvass or COC) but also the component vote subtotals (Statement of Votes or SOV).
The Automated Election System (AES) Watch had previously recommended that Comelec should install projectors in every canvassing center to show both the COCs and the SOVs to detect discrepancies between the precinct-reported SOVs and those shown at the canvassing centers. In the same way, the totals in the COCs can be verified as correct once the individual SOVs are likewise shown in the canvassing center. Last April 14, the Management Association of the Philippines advocated this move in a press conference on automated elections at the Asian Institute of Management.
Rodolfo Niones, chair of the KASAMNE onion grower association, pointed out that the estimated P500 million cost of implementing these two actions was a very small part of the P7.2 billion allocated for the AES, and less than the P700 million that was almost spent for the election folders. Ruperto Aleroza, chair of Pambansang Katipunan ng Samahan sa Kanayunan (PKSK) and also chair of Kilusang Mangingisdan (KM), the nation’s biggest fisherfolk coalition, concluded: “That is a small price to pay for a credible election and an admirable Comelec legacy for others to follow.”
News: Comelec rules out parallel manual count

abs-cbnNEWS.com: MANILA, Philippines – The Commission on Elections on Wednesday ruled out a parallel manual count for national positions amid concerns by a group of IT experts that poll results could be rigged.
Comelec spokesman James Jimenez said a random manual audit will be made after a proclamation is made to check if the figures match. Comelec Commissioner Gregorio Larrazabal, for his part, said the poll body is ready to sit down with IT experts who have concerns about the automated polls.
Jimenez also appealed to critics to stop scaring the public with failure of election scenarios. He warned those undermining the credibility of the elections could face an election offense.
The president of the Philippine Software Industry Association on Wednesday urged Comelec to implement a select parallel manual count of the May 10 elections to ensure the credibility of the country’s first nationwide automated polls.
In an interview on radio dzMM, PSIA president Maria Cristina Coronel said various IT groups are calling for a simplified parallel count that would only involve counting the votes for the president, vice president and mayor.
Under the proposal, members of the boards of election inspectors (BEIs) would do a manual count of the votes for the three positions and compare it with the results of the counting of the Precinct Count Optical Scan (PCOS) machines.
Coronel said BEIs could do the manual count for about 3 hours after polling booths close on election day. “If they do not match, the proposal is to count all the votes in the entire precinct,” she said.
Coronel said IT professionals have various concerns about the credibility of the country’s first ever nationwide automated election. These include the Commission on Elections’ failure to conduct an end-to-end simulation and full test of the automated election system.
“Typically, when we implement a system, we normally do a pilot run and a parallel run just to make sure that the system is working well and the results are credible,” she said.
She added: “Nababagabag o nababahala is the right term because we know that Comelec is not yet ready based on the things that we are seeing right now. So we cannot just sit down and wait. You are like a doctor that sees a disease but you are not doing anything to bring a cure. I guess that’s a sin of omission on our end. At this point, I think we need to act.”
Last Sunday, at least two of 20 PCOS machines at voting precincts in Hong Kong stalled and did not accept filled-up ballots that were being inserted by overseas Filipino voters. Officials of Comelec and poll machine supplier Smartmatic-TIM said the machines stalled temporarily due to condensation. They said the machines worked perfectly after an hour.
Smartmatic Asia-Pacific president Cesar Flores earlier said the failure of a few machines on the May 10 elections is expected and should not be taken to mean a failure of the automation process. He said the boards of election inspectors could use the backup machines or even allow the voters to vote manually and then count the ballots at the nearest precinct.
Makati Rep. Teodoro Locsin Jr., co-chair of the joint congressional committee on the automated elections, said the absentee voting process in Hong Kong proceeded as planned despite the temporary glitches.
“[The machines] didn’t malfunction, it just needed to dry out. The weather was nice, the temperature was muggy and wet but cool. [That problem] will be absent here in the Philippines because it is too dry,” he said.
He said two absentee voters actually spoiled their ballots during the voting. He said one voter deliberately crumpled the ballot to see if the machine would reject it while the other accidentally smudged her ballot due to pen stains.
News: Garci’s ghost haunts techies
Philippine Daily Inquirer: MANILA, Philippines—The specters of “Garci” and glitches are fueling urgent calls for hybrid elections.
Information technology professionals fearing hiccups in the automated election system (AES) on May 10 have pressed demands for a parallel manual count.
They said that the Commission on Elections (Comelec) should consider a manual count after the electronic transmission of results to various canvassing centers and before the proclamation of any candidate.
Maria Cristina Coronel, president of the Philippine Software Industry Association, said that the partial manual count for the presidential, vice presidential and the mayoral races could be done by the board of election inspectors (BEI).
“Unless we do a full count at all precincts, of at least the top two positions, we cannot say with confidence that the coming elections in May will be free of any form of cheating,” Coronel said in a press briefing sponsored by the Movement for Good Governance.
Ex-President Joseph Estrada’s Puwersa ng Masang Pilipino (PMP) also has asked the Comelec to conduct a parallel manual count after two out of 20 counting machines in absentee voting in Hong Kong failed over the weekend.
“That’s a 10-percent failure rate, which is definitely not acceptable,” said PMP senatorial candidate Jose de Venecia III, an information technology businessman and the PMP’s spokesperson on automated election concerns.
“The Comelec has no choice but to conduct a parallel manual count on all precincts nationwide,” he said.
De Venecia said that with the expected failure of at least 10 percent of the more than 70,000 counting machines on May 10, “the results of the elections at the national level will all be contestable.”
Coronel said the manual count would not pose a heavy financial burden. It would not also delay the announcement of results and would discourage losing politicians from thinking that the machines were rigged.
Time, motion study
She noted that a time and motion study had revealed that it would only take three hours for a precinct with 500 voters and five hours for a precinct with 1,000 voters to do the manual tally.
About 50 million Filipinos have registered to vote in the 76,000 precincts using counting machines that would tabulate and transmit results electronically.
Ma. Corazon Akol, president of the Philippine National IT Standards Foundation, said the use of the precinct count optical scan (PCOS) machines did not guarantee that the elections would be free of fraud.
Akol said the compact flash cards could contain commands that could manipulate the results.
Gus Lagman, convenor of the transparentelections.org, also warned against high-tech cheating. He said that lack of system transparency could allow a government insider to rig the election. He added that the automated system was not fail-safe.
The specter of an electronic “Garci” is real under the electronic balloting system using state-of-the-art programs, Lagman said, referring to former Comelec Commissioner Virgilio Garcillano.
Garcillano allegedly manipulated results in the 2004 election to favor President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo with the help of military generals in Maguindanao province. She has denied the charge.
Selected massive cheating
“Our concern today is more focused on the high probability of massive cheating in selected areas involving national, local and even party-list elections,” Lagman said.
AES Watch, a consortium of poll watchdog groups from the church and the civil society, urged the Comelec to hold another mock elections and install large video projectors that will show real-time tallies.
The group also supported calls pushing the Comelec to allow independent third-parties to conduct a random manual audit of ballots from at least 1,500 ballots before the announcement of winners.
AES Watch said in a letter to Comelec Chair Jose Melo that these measures could be costly but that it was a small price to pay to ensure “trouble-free and credible elections.”
The group noted that the projectors, the manual audit, and the mock elections a day before the actual polls would make the detection of the printed and the transmitted election results easier.
The Comelec has yet to decide on whether to hold the random manual audit of votes, which is mandated by law, before or after the proclamation of the candidates.
Melo has said he favors the post-proclamation audit so as not to delay the results and defeat the purpose of computerized balloting.
The Comelec says that in the automated balloting, results for the local races will be known in 12 hours after the voting, while national contest winners can be proclaimed within two to three days.
PMP vice presidential candidate and Makati Mayor Jejomar Binay also urged the Comelec to take note of the delays caused by faulty PCOS machines in Hong Kong and prepare contingency measures.
“The weather conditions in Hong Kong and the Philippines are different. But so is the situation for voting. Such delays can be accommodated during absentee voting, but we do not have such luxury on May 10. They are given several days to cast their ballots so should they fail, they can try again. Here, we only have one day,” Binay said.


